AWESIM VIDEO GUIDE · NSW BUILDING DISPUTES
What Is a Scott Schedule?
Watch Glen Sim explain how a Scott Schedule organises alleged building defects, competing responses and rectification costs for an NCAT building dispute.
Video: “What is a NCAT Scott Schedule?” by Awesim Building Consultants.
A PUBLIC RECORD OF EXPERIENCE
Still relevant more than a decade later
This video was created and published more than 10 years ago, when Glen Sim had already accumulated over five years’ experience supporting building-dispute matters and preparing Scott Schedules. Today, in 2026, Glen brings more than 15 years of litigation support experience—backed by over 35 years in the building and construction industry.
Its continued relevance demonstrates the maturity of Glen’s knowledge as an expert witness. While directions and formats must always be checked for each matter, the essential purpose remains unchanged: to organise defects, competing positions, rectification methodology and costs into a clear, evidence-led schedule.
Few building consultants can point to a comparable public record of long-standing Scott Schedule knowledge and practical experience across Sydney and New South Wales.
REQUEST A WRITTEN FEE PROPOSAL
Tell us briefly about your building dispute
Include any NCAT or court deadline. Your information remains private, and the form is arranged in one clear column for easy completion.
Prefer to speak now? Call 1800 293 746
35+
Years in construction
15+
Years supporting Tribunal matters
3,000+
Properties reported
232673C
NSW builder licence
THE PRACTICAL DEFINITION
One document that compares both sides of each disputed item
Building disputes become difficult to follow when defects, incomplete work, standards, photographs, quotations and competing opinions are scattered across several reports. A Scott Schedule creates a consistent row for every item so the same issue can be compared without repeatedly searching through the evidence.
In a typical NSW home building dispute, the schedule may identify the contractual requirement, the applicant’s allegation and estimate of loss, the respondent’s answer and estimate, and an area reserved for the Tribunal Member. The format should follow the applicable directions and the needs of the particular matter.
Its value is not the spreadsheet alone. The strength comes from connecting each short entry to reliable technical evidence, an appropriate rectification method and a defensible cost basis.

Think of it as an evidence map
Each row isolates one issue. Each column shows what is alleged, what is disputed, what the evidence says and what the rectification may cost.
WHAT A SCOTT SCHEDULE MAY CONTAIN
The anatomy of a clear schedule
The precise headings can vary, but these are the functions commonly required in a building dispute schedule.
01 · Item and location
A separate number, concise description and exact location for each alleged defect or incomplete work item.
02 · Required work
The contract, plan, specification, statutory warranty or technical requirement said to apply to the work.
03 · Applicant’s position
The defect alleged, the factual basis for the claim and the applicant’s estimate of loss or rectification cost.
04 · Respondent’s position
Whether the item is admitted, denied or not admitted, together with the technical response and alternative estimate.
05 · Expert evidence
References to reports, photographs, standards, rectification methodology, quantities and supporting cost information.
06 · Decision or agreement
Space for agreed positions, residual disagreement, joint expert comments or the Tribunal’s determination.
FOR APPLICANTS AND HOMEOWNERS
Turn a list of concerns into an evidence-led claim
A homeowner’s schedule should do more than name a visible symptom. It should identify the particular work complained of, explain why it does not meet the relevant requirement, state an appropriate rectification method and support the claimed amount.
A clear schedule can also expose gaps early—for example, an item without a location, a cost without a scope, or a defect allegation that is not supported by the expert report.
FOR BUILDERS AND RESPONDENTS
Respond to every item with technical precision
A respondent’s schedule provides a disciplined way to state whether each allegation is admitted, denied or not admitted, explain the reason, identify any alternative scope and address the claimed cost—even where liability is disputed.
This item-by-item method helps separate genuine technical disagreement from matters that may be capable of agreement or commercial resolution.
EXPERT REPORT vs SCOTT SCHEDULE
Related documents with different jobs
An expert report develops the technical opinion. The Scott Schedule compresses the disputed items into a comparative working document. In many matters they should be read together.
Expert witness report
- Records observations and investigations
- Identifies relevant technical requirements
- Explains causes and expert reasoning
- Sets out rectification methodology
- Provides the foundation for expert opinions
Scott Schedule
- Lists each disputed item separately
- Compares the parties’ positions side by side
- Links concise entries back to evidence
- Records competing cost estimates
- Helps narrow what remains in dispute
HOW AWESIM CAN HELP
From scattered evidence to a usable schedule
Every engagement is scoped to the directions, the number and complexity of the items, the available evidence and the deadline.
1
Review
Directions, reports, contract documents and deadlines.
2
Inspect
The property and disputed work, where required.
3
Analyse
Requirements, evidence, cause and rectification.
4
Cost
Scope, quantities, rates and supporting estimates.
5
Issue
A checked schedule aligned with the expert evidence.
BEFORE YOU CONTACT US
Documents that help us assess your matter
- Current NCAT or court directions and filing dates
- The building contract, plans, specifications and variations
- Existing expert reports and Scott Schedules
- Clear photographs identifying each location
- Quotations, invoices and rectification estimates
- Relevant correspondence and your solicitor’s instructions
COMMON PROBLEMS WE LOOK FOR
Clarity before volume
- Several defects combined in one row
- Descriptions with no precise location
- Costs that do not match the proposed scope
- Schedule items absent from the expert report
- Photographs that cannot be traced to an item
- Different numbering across competing documents
A long schedule is not necessarily a strong schedule. Brevity, consistency and traceable evidence make the document easier to use.
CLIENT FEEDBACK
Trusted building dispute support across NSW
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Questions about Scott Schedules
Is the correct term Scott Schedule or Scots Schedule?
What is a Scott Schedule in simple terms?
What is a Scott Schedule used for in NCAT?
Is a Scott Schedule the same as an expert witness report?
Who can prepare a Scott Schedule?
Does every NCAT building dispute require a Scott Schedule?
What information should I provide to Awesim?
Can a Scott Schedule include rectification costs?
Can Awesim assist a builder responding to a claim?
What happens during an expert conclave?
How long does preparation take?
How do I request a fee proposal?
READY TO DISCUSS YOUR SCHEDULE?
Get clear about the issues before your deadline
Speak with Glen Sim, Senior Building Consultant, about the existing evidence, the required format and the next practical step for your NSW building dispute.
